Declining to take part in roadside evaluations of coordination and cognitive operate, usually requested by regulation enforcement throughout a site visitors cease when suspicion of impaired driving exists, has particular authorized ramifications. These evaluations sometimes contain actions designed to evaluate steadiness, coordination, and the power to comply with directions. For example, a driver may be requested to stroll a straight line heel-to-toe or stand on one leg.
The choice to withhold consent for these procedures carries potential penalties, which differ by jurisdiction. Traditionally, implied consent legal guidelines presume that drivers have agreed to undergo chemical testing (breath, blood, or urine) if arrested for driving below the affect. Refusal could result in speedy license suspension, even and not using a DUI conviction. Moreover, the act of non-compliance itself may be admissible in courtroom as proof of doable impairment, although the burden given to such proof is topic to judicial interpretation and authorized arguments.
